Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Zmień bibliotekę
Tytuł pozycji:

Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist.

Tytuł :
Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist.
Autorzy :
Sepucha KR; Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abhyankar P; Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Hoffman AS; Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Bekker HL; Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
LeBlanc A; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval Faculte de medecine, Quebec, Canada.
Levin CA; Department of Research, Healthwise Inc, Boise, Idaho, USA.
Ropka M; Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Shaffer VA; Health Sciences and Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Sheridan SL; The Reaching for High Value Care Team, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Stacey D; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.; School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Stalmeier P; Health Evidence, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Vo H; Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Wills CE; College of Nursing, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Thomson R; Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Pokaż więcej
Źródło :
BMJ quality & safety [BMJ Qual Saf] 2018 May; Vol. 27 (5), pp. 380-388. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Dec 21.
Typ publikacji :
Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Język :
English
Imprint Name(s) :
Original Publication: London : BMJ Pub. Group
MeSH Terms :
Decision Support Techniques*
Checklist/*standards
Outcome Assessment, Health Care/*standards
Patient Participation/*methods
Delphi Technique ; Humans ; Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards ; Quality of Health Care
References :
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4:CD001431. (PMID: 28402085)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S13. (PMID: 24625064)
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jul;34(5):560-6. (PMID: 24713692)
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12 ):986-992. (PMID: 26369893)
Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar;94(3):361-6. (PMID: 14998794)
Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):699-710. (PMID: 23963501)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S8. (PMID: 24625261)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S11. (PMID: 24624995)
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7. (PMID: 17938396)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S10. (PMID: 24624970)
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;4:11. (PMID: 25623074)
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 May;27(5):389-412. (PMID: 29467235)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S6. (PMID: 24625214)
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687. (PMID: 24609605)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S12. (PMID: 24625035)
BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. (PMID: 16908462)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S7. (PMID: 24625237)
Implement Sci. 2015 Mar 30;10:42. (PMID: 25888928)
Trials. 2015 May 03;16:204. (PMID: 25935741)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S5. (PMID: 24625191)
PLoS Med. 2010 Feb 16;7(2):e1000217. (PMID: 20169112)
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008-15. (PMID: 11095242)
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jul;100(7):1387-1393. (PMID: 28256281)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S2. (PMID: 24625093)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S3. (PMID: 24625114)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S4. (PMID: 24625127)
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):726-32. (PMID: 20335313)
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Oct;19(5):null. (PMID: 21986662)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S9. (PMID: 24625283)
Contributed Indexing :
Keywords: checklists*; patient education*; patient-centred care*; shared decision making*
Entry Date(s) :
Date Created: 20171223 Date Completed: 20190729 Latest Revision: 20220716
Update Code :
20220717
PubMed Central ID :
PMC5965362
DOI :
10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006986
PMID :
29269567
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Patient decision aids (PDAs) are evidence-based tools designed to help patients make specific and deliberated choices among healthcare options. The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration review papers and Cochrane systematic review of PDAs have found significant gaps in the reporting of evaluations of PDAs, including poor or limited reporting of PDA content, development methods and delivery. This study sought to develop and reach consensus on reporting guidelines to improve the quality of publications evaluating PDAs.
Methods: An international workgroup, consisting of members from IPDAS Collaboration, followed established methods to develop reporting guidelines for PDA evaluation studies. This paper describes the results from three completed phases: (1) planning, (2) drafting and (3) consensus, which included a modified, two-stage, online international Delphi process. The work was conducted over 2 years with bimonthly conference calls and three in-person meetings. The workgroup used input from these phases to produce a final set of recommended items in the form of a checklist.
Results: The SUNDAE Checklist (Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations) includes 26 items recommended for studies reporting evaluations of PDAs. In the two-stage Delphi process, 117/143 (82%) experts from 14 countries completed round 1 and 96/117 (82%) completed round 2. Respondents reached a high level of consensus on the importance of the items and indicated strong willingness to use the items when reporting PDA studies.
Conclusion: The SUNDAE Checklist will help ensure that reports of PDA evaluation studies are understandable, transparent and of high quality. A separate Explanation and Elaboration publication provides additional details to support use of the checklist.
(© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)
Comment in: BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 May;27(5):337-339. (PMID: 29371413)

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies