Informacja

Drogi użytkowniku, aplikacja do prawidłowego działania wymaga obsługi JavaScript. Proszę włącz obsługę JavaScript w Twojej przeglądarce.

Przeglądasz jako GOŚĆ
Zmień bibliotekę
Tytuł pozycji:

Principles and related strategies for spinal cord injury research partnership approaches: a qualitative study

Tytuł :
Principles and related strategies for spinal cord injury research partnership approaches: a qualitative study
Autorzy :
Hoekstra, Femke
SCI Guiding Principles Consensus Panel
Gainforth, Heather L.
Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research
Pokaż więcej
Temat :
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Physiology
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Źródło :
Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice ; ISSN 1744-2648
Informacja o wydawcy :
Bristol University Press
Rok publikacji :
2021
Typ dokumentu :
article in journal/newspaper
Język :
English
DOI :
10.1332/174426421x16161715996124
Dostępność :
https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421x16161715996124
Numer akcesji :
edsbas.A93B1A1
Czasopismo naukowe
Background: Conducting and/or disseminating research in partnership with potential research users is a popular approach to conducting useful and relevant research. Despite calls for guidance to support these research partnerships, evidence-based tools and resources remain limited. Aims and objectives: This study aimed to explore principles and related strategies for conducting and/or disseminating spinal cord injury (SCI) research in partnership with the SCI community, in order to gain insight into ways to support SCI research partnerships.This qualitative study included ten semi-structured interviews with SCI research partnership champions. The interviews focused on participants’ experiences with SCI research projects that are conducted or disseminated in partnership, and related principles and strategies to work in research partnerships.Participants mainly talked about principles related to: (1) the relationship between researchers and research users (for example, respect each other, avoid tokenism); (2) co-production of knowledge (for example, research user engagement early and throughout ); and (3) meaningful engagement (for example, allowing flexibility). Examples of related strategies included attending collaborative conferences, research user engagement in refinement of research questions, training in research methods, and hiring people with SCI as part of the research team. Key conclusions: This qualitative study presents research partnership principles (norms) and related strategies (observable actions). This study can provide guidance for other researchers and research users who want to engage in (SCI) research partnerships. The findings of this study could be used to inform the development of evidence-based tools and resources to support future research partnerships. Key messages
  • We provide guidance for researchers and research users to engage in research partnerships;
  • The guidance includes research partnership principles (norms) and related strategies (observable actions);
  • Linking strategies to principles may help researchers and their partners to engage in research partnerships;
  • This study can support the use of research partnership principles within a research system.

Ta witryna wykorzystuje pliki cookies do przechowywania informacji na Twoim komputerze. Pliki cookies stosujemy w celu świadczenia usług na najwyższym poziomie, w tym w sposób dostosowany do indywidualnych potrzeb. Korzystanie z witryny bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zamieszczane w Twoim komputerze. W każdym momencie możesz dokonać zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies